Research 25 July 2026

    One euro over €85,000 costs a professional €18,141

    Everyone knows the forfettario ends at €85,000. Almost nobody publishes what the far side looks like, so we computed it: the size of the drop, and how much extra revenue it takes to climb back to where you were.

    By Jan Wangrat · 25 July 2026

    Every guide to Italy’s flat-rate regime tells you the ceiling: €85,000 of revenue a year, and above it the forfettario is gone.1 Almost none of them tell you what the other side looks like — which is odd, because that is the part you would want to plan around.

    So we ran it. The numbers below come from the same deterministic engine behind our public calculators: 2026 rates, INPS Gestione Separata at 26.07%, IRPEF plus regional and municipal surcharges on the far side, no real business costs assumed.345

    €18,141

    That is what a professional on the 78% coefficient loses, in a single year, by being on the wrong side of the line. At €85,000 of revenue they keep €60,363 after tax and contributions. Under ordinary IRPEF, the same €85,000 leaves €42,222. The regime is worth more than a fifth of the take-home it protects.2

    The second number is the one nobody quotes. To get back to €60,363 of net income under ordinary rules, that professional has to bill €129,820 — €44,820 more revenue, a 53% increase, for exactly the same money in their pocket. Everything between is a dead zone: more work, more risk, more clients, no gain.

    Figure 1Net income by revenue, professional on the 78% coefficient, 2026 rules

    Computed with the TaxCompass tax engine at €250 revenue steps and sampled every €5,000 for the chart. Assumes Gestione Separata at 26.07%, the 15% substitute rate, and no deductible costs. The dashed line marks the revenue you must reach on the far side to match your net at the ceiling.21

    The cliff is not the same height for everyone

    The forfettario taxes a fixed share of revenue, set by your activity’s ATECO group — 40% to 86%, depending on what you do.1 A lower coefficient means a smaller taxable base, which means the regime is worth more to you, which means losing it hurts more. The cliff is steepest for the people the regime treats best.

    Figure 2What crossing the ceiling costs, by coefficient
    CoefficientTypical activityNet at €85kDropBack to level
    78%Professionals — consultants, designers, engineers€60,363€18,141€129,820
    67%Other activities (the residual band)€63,838€21,616€138,400
    40%Food and drink retail€72,366€30,144€159,460

    Same engine, same assumptions, three of the statutory coefficienti di redditività. “Back to level” is the revenue at which ordinary-regime net income returns to what it was at €85,000.2

    You do not fall off it the same day

    The chart is a clean vertical drop, and the law is gentler than that about timing. Bill between €85,000 and €100,000 and you keep the regime for the year you are in and lose it from the next one. Pass €100,000 and it ends immediately, with VAT obligations from the moment you cross.1

    So read the drop as the year after, not the invoice itself — which is worse for planning, not better. The decision that costs you €18,141 is one you make in November and pay for the following December, by which time you cannot unmake it.

    People already behave as if they know this

    There is good evidence that the threshold moves real behaviour. Using Italian administrative data on solo self-employed, Francesco Alosa measured the distribution of turnover around the regime’s earlier €65,000 cut-off and found excess mass just below it of roughly 337% of the counterfactual frequency — an unusually large bunching response.6 Estimated turnover elasticities were 0.071 for professionals and 0.058 for business intermediaries, and lower compliance costs explained under half of the response. The rest was the tax.

    In other words: thousands of Italian freelancers already stop just short of the line every year. Our number puts a price on what they are avoiding.

    What we assumed, and where it bends

    Three assumptions do most of the work here. We assume no deductible business costs — under ordinary rules real costs come off the taxable base, so a consultant with heavy expenses faces a shallower cliff and an earlier break-even. We use the standard 15% substitute rate rather than the 5% startup rate, which would make the drop larger. And we use Gestione Separata contributions; a professional in a cassa or an artisan in Gestione Artigiani has a different contribution profile.3

    None of that moves the shape. A regime that ends at a fixed revenue number, rather than tapering, necessarily produces a discontinuity — and the size of that discontinuity is a fact about the rules, not an opinion about them. It is also, for anyone billing in the seventies, the single most consequential number in Italian freelance tax, and it is not published anywhere we could find. So here it is, with the workings.

    Download the full curve (CSV, 441 rows)Net income at €250 revenue steps from €60,000 to €170,000, for the 78%, 67% and 40% coefficients under 2026 rules.

    Sources

    1. 1.Normattiva — L. 190/2014, art. 1 commi 54–89 e Allegato 4 (regime forfettario, coefficienti di redditività)
    2. 2.TaxCompass dataset — net income either side of the €85,000 forfettario ceiling, 2026 rules, three coefficienti (CSV)
    3. 3.Normattiva — L. 335/1995, art. 2 (INPS Gestione Separata)
    4. 4.Normattiva — TUIR (DPR 917/1986), artt. 11 e 13 (IRPEF)
    5. 5.Normattiva — D.Lgs. 446/1997 (addizionale regionale IRPEF)
    6. 6.Alosa, F. (April 2025) — Estimating the Elasticity of Turnover from Bunching: Preferential Tax Regimes for Solo Self-employed in Italy (working paper)

    Every external figure above links to the document it came from. Datasets we produced are downloadable so you can check the arithmetic rather than take our word for it.

    More research

    Get this answered for your exact situation

    Build a free, source-backed setup plan in minutes — the right regime, ATECO code, INPS scheme and real numbers for you. Or ask the AI a specific question, every answer cited to the law.